Contact

Data Behind Discovery

AI systems are already rewriting the rules of discoverability. Where once visibility depended on SEO and backlinks, today it relies on verified expertise, structured context, and reputation signals machines can read.

1. Why “data behind discovery” matters now

Search is no longer a list of blue links. Generative engines surface direct answers, often highlighting trusted sources and well-structured entities. If your brand isn’t machine-readable, you risk being invisible—even with strong human-facing content.

  • Google’s own guidance emphasises structured data and helpful, reliable content as the basis for rich results and visibility. Most implementations rely on schema.org vocabularies interpreted through Google Search documentation. Google for Developers+2Schema.org+2

  • Answer engines such as Perplexity prominently cite sources and favour easily verifiable material—raising the stakes for clear citations, consistent entities, and structured context. Perplexity AI

  • McKinsey reports that around half of consumers now use AI when searching the internet, signalling a rapid shift towards AI-mediated discovery. McKinsey & Company

Bottom line: discoverability is earned through data quality + authority signals, not just keywords.

2. What AI systems look for (in plain English)

AI search and answer engines blend retrieval from the open web with model reasoning. While implementations vary, five patterns are consistent:

  1. Entity clarity
    Engines map your brand to a recognisable entity (name, sameAs links, org details). Ambiguity hurts recall.
    Action: Use Organisation/Person schema, consistent naming, and authoritative profiles.

  2. Structured context
    Models prefer material that’s easy to parse and verify (schema markup, clean page structure, clear headings). Google for Developers

  3. Source credibility
    Cited, updated, consensus-aligned sources are preferred. Perplexity’s product literature highlights citations and verifiability; OpenAI research has long stressed source-backed answers. Perplexity AI+1

  4. Recency + governance
    Fresh, governed information (versioning, review dates) boosts trust. Growing AI governance adoption reflects this need. DataGalaxy

  5. User-centred relevance
    Signals that content directly addresses the query (task intent, FAQs, comparisons) are more likely to be surfaced.

3. The new hierarchy of signals

Think of AI-era discoverability as three concentric layers:

a) Primary signals (machine-legible authority)

  • Organisation/Person schema with legal name, address, identifiers, and sameAs links.

  • Article/FAQ/HowTo markup with dates, authors, and citations.

  • Product/Service markup with attributes users care about.

  • Citations to reputable sources; outbound links that clarify context.
    Why it matters: This is the “source of truth” that engines can parse with low ambiguity. Google for Developers+1

b) Secondary signals (reputation + consistency)

  • Mentions on reputable sites; aligned NAP (name–address–phone) and GEO data.

  • Publisher partnerships/licensing that allow safe reuse with attribution (e.g., news collaborations). Le Monde.fr

c) Tertiary signals (engagement + experience)

  • Readability, UX, load speed, and helpful multimedia.

  • Clear “evidence of care” (reviewed by, last updated, reviewer credentials).

Note on trust: Despite rising usage, public scepticism of AI search persists; 53% of consumers distrust AI-powered results. Brands that document sources, review processes, and governance can stand out. gartner.com

4. A practical framework for AI-ready authority (GEO-aligned)

Use this four-stage framework to operationalise “data behind discovery.”

Stage 1 — Map your entity

  • Establish a canonical Entity File (brand story, legal name, identifiers, addresses, leadership bios).

  • Publish Organisation schema across your site; align sameAs to key authoritative profiles. Google for Developers

Stage 2 — Structure what matters

  • Mark up core pages (Home, About, Services, Articles, FAQs).

  • Add FAQPage only where it genuinely helps users.

  • Use Article with author, reviewer, and dateModified; link out to supporting sources.

Stage 3 — Build citation networks

  • Pursue editorial citations (industry sites, journals, standards bodies).

  • Create evidence pages: research summaries, methods, data notes, and policy pages.

  • Where appropriate, consider licensing/partnerships that enable safe reuse of your content by answer engines while preserving attribution. Le Monde.fr

Stage 4 — Govern & measure

  • Maintain change logs, review cadences, and source registers.

  • Track surfaces beyond traditional SERPs: answer boxes, AI overviews, citation panels, and agent recommendations.

  • Integrate with marketing ops: campaign tags, UTM conventions, attribution models.

5. Showcase: what “good” looks like on a page

For a single authoritative article:

  • Above the fold: clear claim, brief summary, date updated, author credentials.

  • Body: short sections, labelled tables/figures, explicit definitions of terms.

  • References: two tiers—primary research (reports, standards) and industry commentary.

  • Structured data: Article + FAQPage (if relevant), breadcrumb, Org/Person context.

  • Signals of stewardship: editorial policy, review notes, version ID.

This shape enables both human skimming and machine certainty.

6. Evidence that structure and citation drive visibility

  • Structured data is foundational for rich results and discoverability—Google’s Search Central treats it as the primary way to help Search understand page content; most of it uses schema.org. Google for Developers

  • On-answer citations are a feature, not a fad: Perplexity positions citations as core to its UX and trust model. Perplexity AI

  • AI-mediated discovery is mainstream: McKinsey reports ~50% consumer usage of AI for search—brands must design for engines that synthesise and cite. McKinsey & Company

  • Trust gap: with a majority of consumers wary of AI search impartiality, transparent sourcing becomes a visible differentiator. gartner.com

  • Personalisation pressure: AI-driven experiences amplify the advantage for entities with clear data and governance. McKinsey & Company

7. Implementing the Data-Behind-Discovery Stack

Here’s a pragmatic, six-workstream stack you can execute over 8–12 weeks:

  1. Entity & Taxonomy

    • Canonical names, synonyms, disambiguation notes; topic clusters; internal linking blueprint.

  2. Schema & Markup

    • Organisation/Person site-wide; Article, FAQ, Breadcrumb, Product/Service as relevant; governance for dateModified/author/reviewer. Google for Developers

  3. Citation & GEO

    • Source register; outreach to reputable publishers; local/global NAP consistency; Wikidata/Wikipedia suitability assessment (where appropriate).

  4. Evidence & Governance

    • Editorial policy, sourcing standards, model usage disclosure, privacy and AI safety notes; review cadence; change log. DataGalaxy

  5. Experience & Extraction

    • Clean headings; labelled tables; alt text; minimal JS blocking; PDF alternatives with HTML summaries for extractability.

  6. Measurement & Surfaces

    • Track AI-surface impressions/citations; monitor answer engines that explicitly cite (e.g., Perplexity) and those where structure correlates with coverage (e.g., Google AI overviews where available). Perplexity AI

8. Common pitfalls (and how to fix them)

  • Over-marking everything: Use markup that reflects visible on-page content; don’t stuff. Google for Developers

  • Unstable entity data: If your name/addresses vary by page or directory, engines will not connect the dots.

  • No outbound citations: If you assert claims with no references, you’ll miss on-answer credibility (and risk user distrust). gartner.com

  • PDF-only thinking: Provide HTML summaries of reports so engines can parse key facts.

9. Sample page architecture (for repeatable authority)

Template: Insight article

  • H1: Specific, answer-shaped title

  • Intro: one-paragraph verdict + who it helps

  • H2 blocks: definitions → frameworks → steps → examples → risks → references

  • Sidebar: entity card (org facts), author bio, last-reviewed date

  • Footer: references (primary research first), related articles, FAQs

Template: Evidence page

  • Purpose: methods, sources, metrics, collection windows

  • Change log with version IDs

  • Links to datasets or annexes

10. FAQs

Q1. How does structured data help with AI discoverability?
It turns your content into machine-readable signals. Search engines use schema markup to better understand entities and context, which supports rich results and increases the chance of being cited in AI answers. Google for Developers+1

Q2. Do answer engines actually cite sources?
Yes. Perplexity highlights citations in-line and positions them as a core feature for verification—design your content and references accordingly. Perplexity AI

Q3. Isn’t traditional SEO enough?
Traditional SEO helps—but AI systems emphasise entity clarity, citations, and governance. Aligning data and reputation signals increases selection by AI overviews and answer engines. Google for Developers+1

Q4. What evidence shows consumers are shifting to AI-mediated discovery?
Recent McKinsey work indicates about half of consumers now use AI when searching, and AI-driven personalisation continues to rise. McKinsey & Company+1

Q5. How do we maintain trust as AI surfaces our content?
Combine transparent sourcing, review dates, and governance disclosures (policies, change logs). This addresses the consumer trust gap around AI summaries. gartner.com+1

11. References (selected)

  • Google Search Central: Intro to structured data; schema usage and implementation notes. Google for Developers

  • Schema.org: the shared vocabulary underlying most search markup. Schema.org+1

  • Perplexity: product help centre on citations; guidance on exploring sources. Perplexity AI+1

  • McKinsey (2025): AI-mediated discovery and personalisation trends. McKinsey & Company+1

  • Gartner (2025): Consumer trust in AI search and need for governance. gartner.com+1

  • OpenAI (WebGPT): source-backed browsing research emphasising citations/verifiability. OpenAI